What did Spock say at the end of Wrath of Khan? Or the one.” Who said it?: James Kirk and Spock The story behind the quote: The quote was actually mentioned twice in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Spock answers, “No, but it is the human thing to do.” Although Spock reaffirms his claim that the needs of the many logically outweigh the needs of the few, he suggests that sometimes we must do the “human” thing, not the logical thing, and put the needs of the few (or the one) first. What did Spock say about the needs of the many? He did eventually marry in a ceremony attended by Lt. In 2267, however, T’Pring chose Stonn, a Vulcan, over Spock, and the Vulcan returned to the U.S.S. Even his greeting “live long and prosper” is based on logic.Īt age 7, Spock was telepathically bonded with a young Vulcan girl named T’Pring. In this case, Spock considered that to save the lives of his shipmates and the ship, he should sacrifice his own life. Spock says, “Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Captain Kirk answers, “Or the one.” This sets up a pivotal scene near the end of the film. What did Spock say about the good of the many? The needs of the many outweigh (the needs of the few). Kirk (William Shatner) as he died: (“Don’t grieve, Admiral. “Insufficient facts always invite danger.” “Without followers, evil cannot spread.” “Space: the final frontier. This line was spoken by Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy) in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, directed by Nicholas Meyer (1982).Īs well as “live long and prosper”, below are some more of Spock’s best quotes. Who originally said the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?
4 Why did Spock say that Kirk should not have been promoted?.3 What did Spock say about the needs of the many?.2 What did Spock say about the good of the many?.1 Who originally said the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?.We end by discussing the specific pattern of variable and consistent features in the context of evolutionary theories of the evolution of morality. In addition to finding some amount of cross-cultural variation on most of our questions, we also find two cross-culturally consistent judgments: (1) when individuals are in equivalent situations, overall welfare should be maximized, and (2) harm to individuals should be taken into account, and some types of individual harm can trump overall group welfare.
#THE NEEDS OF THE MANY OUTWEIGH THE NEEDS OF THE FEW ORIGIN SERIES#
In the current study, we ask participants across nine diverse cultures (Bali, Costa Rica, France, Guatemala, Japan, Madagascar, Mongolia, Serbia, and the USA) to make a series of moral judgments regarding both third-party sacrifice for group welfare and first-person sacrifice for group welfare. Relatively less research has investigated the generalizability of results across non- WEIRD populations.
0 kommentar(er)
